[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13452810#comment-13452810
]
Thomas Jungblut edited comment on HAMA-568 at 9/11/12 7:06 PM:
---------------------------------------------------------------
Do you want to give it a try Mayank? Otherwise I will take a closer look how
this can be done.
Maybe with a map that maps a not synchronized classname to a synchronized one.
I think this should be a good solution here.
was (Author: thomas.jungblut):
Do you want to give it a try Mayank? Otherwise I will take a closer look
how this can be done.
> Add faster synchronized collections for message queues
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HAMA-568
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-568
> Project: Hama
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Thomas Jungblut
> Attachments: HAMA-568_1.patch
>
>
> Currently the synchronized messaging (accessed concurrently via RPC) is done
> with a single mutex object. See org.apache.hama.bsp.message.SynchronizedQueue.
> This can be improved for memory queue by adding the ConcurrentLinkedQueue
> from Java since it has higher throughput.
> Needless to say, we should add some custom synchronized version of a queue,
> maybe through a factory class in the normal version.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
