[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-642?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Thomas Jungblut updated HAMA-642:
---------------------------------

    Affects Version/s: 0.5.0
    
> Make GraphRunner disk based
> ---------------------------
>
>                 Key: HAMA-642
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-642
>             Project: Hama
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: graph
>    Affects Versions: 0.5.0
>            Reporter: Thomas Jungblut
>            Assignee: Thomas Jungblut
>             Fix For: 0.6.0
>
>         Attachments: HAMA-642_unix_1.patch, HAMA-642_unix_2.patch, 
> HAMA-scale_1.patch, HAMA-scale_2.patch, HAMA-scale_3.patch, HAMA-scale_4.patch
>
>
> To improve scalability we can improve the graph runner to be disk based.
> Which basically means:
> - We have just a single Vertex instance that get's refilled.
> - We directly write vertices to disk after partitioning
> - In every superstep we iterate over the vertices on disk, fill the vertex 
> instance and call the users compute functions
> Problems:
> - State other than vertex value can't be stored easy
> - How do we deal with random access after messages have arrived?
> So I think we should make the graph runner more hybrid, like using the queues 
> we have implemented in the messaging. So the graphrunner can be configured to 
> run completely on disk, in cached mode or in in-memory mode.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to