[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-559?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13486833#comment-13486833
 ] 

Suraj Menon commented on HAMA-559:
----------------------------------

Hi, that was a nice catch. I found out that I am doing an extra buffer copy 
than needed. I see that spilling buffer is giving better performance but only 
sometimes. Currently, investigating why so. I implemented a synchronous disk 
queue without a spilling thread. Here are the performance numbers for now. I 
added a case for 10 million integers in your benchmark code. I am putting the 
numbers for both scenarios. I am trying to find out what is changing the 
numbers so drastically on every benchmark run and this is not for just spilling 
buffer.

{noformat}

    size            type        us linear runtime
 1000000       DISK_LIST 221546.22 ==============
 1000000 SPILLING_BUFFER 118403.87 =======
 1000000     DISK_BUFFER  40151.49 ==
10000000       DISK_LIST 473334.31 ==============================
10000000 SPILLING_BUFFER 360539.53 ======================
10000000     DISK_BUFFER 389689.06 ========================

vm: java
trial: 0
benchmark: Spill

{noformat}


The one with bad performance:
{noformat}

    size            type        us linear runtime
 1000000       DISK_LIST   38550.9 =
 1000000 SPILLING_BUFFER  140961.3 ===
 1000000     DISK_BUFFER   44809.6 =
10000000       DISK_LIST  340909.8 =========
10000000 SPILLING_BUFFER 1116445.2 ==============================
10000000     DISK_BUFFER  374593.0 ==========


{noformat}

                
> Add a spilling message queue
> ----------------------------
>
>                 Key: HAMA-559
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-559
>             Project: Hama
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: bsp core
>    Affects Versions: 0.5.0
>            Reporter: Thomas Jungblut
>            Assignee: Suraj Menon
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 0.7.0
>
>         Attachments: HAMA-559.patch-v1, 
> spilling_buffer_cpu_usage_text_write.png, 
> SpillingBufferProfile-2012-10-27.snapshot, 
> spilling_buffer_profile_cpu_graph_test_write.png, 
> spilling_buffer_profile_cpugraph_writeUTF.png, 
> spillingbuffer_profile_cpu_writeUTF.png, spilling_buffer_profile_LOCK.JPG, 
> spilling_buffer_profile_timesplit_text_write.png, 
> spilling_buffer_profile_writeUTF.png
>
>
> After HAMA-521 is done, we can add a spilling queue which just holds the 
> messages in RAM that fit into the heap space. The rest can be flushed to disk.
> We may call this a HybridQueue or something like that.
> The benefits should be that we don't have to flush to disk so often and get 
> faster. However we may have more GC so it is always overall faster.
> The requirements for this queue also include:
> - The message object once written to the queue (after returning from the 
> write call) could be modified, but the changes should not be reflected in the 
> messages stored in the queue.
> - For now let's implement a queue that does not support concurrent reading 
> and writing. This feature is needed when we implement asynchronous 
> communication.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to