Let's solve the memory issue before release. ;-) On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Tommaso Teofili <[email protected]> wrote: > ok thanks for the clarification, let's spin out 0.6.1. > Tommaso > > > 2013/1/24 Edward J. Yoon <[email protected]> > >> The Hama-0.5/0.6 performances has decreased and memory usage has >> increased than Hama-0.4. >> >> The main reason was converting (Bundle object to Bytes) overhead at >> Message compressor (CompressionUtil.getCompressionRatio) and Avro RPC. >> >> In 0.6.1, both are fixed or removed. >> >> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 9:36 PM, Tommaso Teofili >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Hi Edward, >> > One concern of mine is: what about benchmarks? How does the latest Hama >> > trunk compares with 0.5.0 / 0.6.0 ? >> > If the above is improved then I don't see any blockers for 0.6.1. >> > Tommaso >> > >> > >> > 2013/1/23 Edward J. Yoon <[email protected]> >> > >> >> Hi all, >> >> >> >> Today I've tested TRUNK (partitioning) on multi-nodes cluster. It >> >> works well for me and some people want new release[1]. >> >> >> >> What do you think about release partitioning fix version as a >> Hama-0.6.1? >> >> >> >> 1. http://markmail.org/message/2yf4lkgdoreq37gn >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon >> >> @eddieyoon >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon >> @eddieyoon >>
-- Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon @eddieyoon
