[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-704?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13581484#comment-13581484
]
Suraj Menon commented on HAMA-704:
----------------------------------
I have to handle synchronization in the patch and hence the issue. I was not
expecting this given receiver queue is synchronized. I hope everyone is fine
with the idea of coupling message storage? Please let me know in HAMA-734. I
shall get back to this after working on async messaging and sorting.
> Optimization of memory usage during message processing
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HAMA-704
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-704
> Project: Hama
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: graph
> Reporter: Edward J. Yoon
> Assignee: Edward J. Yoon
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 0.6.1
>
> Attachments: HAMA-704.patch-v1, hama-704_v05.patch, localdisk.patch,
> mytest.patch, patch.txt, patch.txt, removeMsgMap.patch
>
>
> <vertex, message> map seems consume a lot of memory. We should figure out an
> efficient way to reduce memory.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
