+1 On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 12:49 AM, Suraj Menon <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 Thank you for the information Edward and we start afresh. I think things > should be lot simpler within a small team like ours. I am touching on > topics related to code and commit protocol here. > > We are trying to get a resolution on three points and the voting could be > done in appropriate channel. Let me know if this is the correct place to do > the votings. > - Voting for/against "Review then commit" policy > - Voting for an appropriate time window that a committer can assume silence > as a +1 on his patch. > - Voting for whether a commit should reflect documentation on Wiki. > > Thanks, > Suraj > > On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:08 AM, Edward J. Yoon <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Hey all, >> >> We are seeing some conflicts between committers (especially me and >> Thomas?) and a growing number of somewhat arrogant, self-centred >> actions. However, I believe that all began with misunderstandings, >> misreadings, and insufficient discussions, (we didn't mean it). Let's >> don't argue anymore since everyone has different sides. >> >> Here's my suggestions: >> >> 1. The RoadMap should be discussed on dev@ and all decisions should be >> described on Wiki[1]. >> 2. Observance of HowToCommit[2] is required of every committers. >> >> We might want to edit some plans/policies of RoadMap and HowToCommit. >> Please feel free to edit them. >> >> And, 3. Discussion in very polite terms. >> >> My only worry is whether we can be able to follow HowToCommit process >> everytime. As you know we're only have 3 active committers (= PMCs). >> >> Any other ideas? >> >> 1. http://wiki.apache.org/hama/RoadMap >> 2. http://wiki.apache.org/hama/HowToCommit >> >> -- >> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon >> @eddieyoon >>
-- Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon @eddieyoon
