[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-745?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13660591#comment-13660591
]
Edward J. Yoon commented on HAMA-745:
-------------------------------------
My idea for reducing memory usage, was use of sorted vertices and sequential
(or serial) processing[1]:
{code}
Edward J. Yoon added a comment - 30/Jan/13 07:25
I'm thinking about external merge sort
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/External_sorting
Edward J. Yoon added a comment - 04/Feb/13 06:28
Once HAMA-723 is done, we can sort messages by vertex ID. Then, we can read
messages of vertex and perform vertex.compute() sequentially.
{code}
And, Thomas Jungblut implemented serial processing and DiskVerticesInfo but,
the problem was that PartitioningRunner creates unsorted partitions.
Do you work on this issue?
1.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-704?focusedCommentId=13566257&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13566257
> ListVerticesInfo doesn't work
> -----------------------------
>
> Key: HAMA-745
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-745
> Project: Hama
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Edward J. Yoon
> Assignee: Edward J. Yoon
> Fix For: 0.6.1
>
> Attachments: HAMA-745.patch, HAMA-745_v02.patch
>
>
> Just tried to use ListVerticesInfo instead of DiskVerticesInfo but doesn't
> work correctly. The reason is that addVertex() changes the same object. It
> need to reinitializing vertex object.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
