[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-776?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13707651#comment-13707651
]
Hudson commented on HAMA-776:
-----------------------------
SUCCESS: Integrated in Hama trunk #145 (See
[https://builds.apache.org/job/Hama%20trunk/145/])
HAMA-776: localQueue is set as Send queue in init function of
AbstractMessageManager (kennethxian: rev 1502739)
* /hama/trunk/CHANGES.txt
*
/hama/trunk/core/src/main/java/org/apache/hama/bsp/message/AbstractMessageManager.java
> localQueue is set as Send queue in init function of AbstractMessageManager
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HAMA-776
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-776
> Project: Hama
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: bsp core
> Affects Versions: 0.6.2
> Reporter: MaoYuan Xian
> Assignee: MaoYuan Xian
> Fix For: 0.6.3
>
> Attachments: HAMA-776.patch
>
>
> In init method of AbstractMessageManager, the following codes found:
> {code}
> public void init(TaskAttemptID attemptId, BSPPeer<?, ?, ?, ?, M> peer,
> Configuration conf, InetSocketAddress peerAddress) {
> ...
> this.peerAddress = peerAddress;
> this.localQueue = getSenderQueue();
> this.localQueueForNextIteration = getSynchronizedReceiverQueue();
> this.maxCachedConnections = conf.getInt(MAX_CACHED_CONNECTIONS_KEY, 100);
> }
> {code}
> The localQueue should be a receiveQueue but it is assigned here, should it be
> changed as following?:
> {code}
> this.localQueue = getSynchronizedReceiverQueue();
> {code}
> Is there any special purpose here when set it as senderQueue?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
