That's cool!
2013/8/11 Edward J. Yoon <[email protected]> > Here's some interesting benchmarks (by Leonidas Fegaras) showing off > the performance of Hama compared to the Spark. Pagerank and KMeans > were run via MRQL query, which is not as fast as the native BSP code. > Moreover, 0.5 is very slow. I've started to think that latest Hama may > be faster than Spark. :-) > > ---- > On laptop with 8 cores: > Hama 0.5 Spark > Pagerank 500K/2M: 211 341 > KMeans 1M: 31 22 > KMeans 2M: 41 40 > KMeans 4M: 165 77 > > On cluster with 64 cores: > Hama 0.5 Spark > Pagerank 1M/10M: 3590 428 > KMeans 10M: 87 82 > KMeans 20M: 129 134 > > On cluster with 32 cores: > Hama 0.5 Spark > Pagerank 1M/10M: 4419 434 > KMeans 10M: 98 74 > KMeans 20M: 273 74 > > > -- > Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon > @eddieyoon > -- ------ Yexi Jiang, ECS 251, [email protected] School of Computer and Information Science, Florida International University Homepage: http://users.cis.fiu.edu/~yjian004/
