[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-794?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

MaoYuan Xian resolved HAMA-794.
-------------------------------

       Resolution: Duplicate
    Fix Version/s: 0.7.0
         Assignee: MaoYuan Xian
    
> When aggregator is enabled, resending message in each message receiving round 
> impacts the iteration performance.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HAMA-794
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-794
>             Project: Hama
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: graph
>            Reporter: MaoYuan Xian
>            Assignee: MaoYuan Xian
>             Fix For: 0.7.0
>
>
> When aggregator is enabled, in each message receiving round, all received 
> message have been resent to put them behind the aggregate message. 
> doAggregationUpdates method of GraphJobRunner Class:
> {code}
>     if (aggregationRunner.isEnabled() && iteration > 1) {
>       // in case we need to sync, we need to replay the messages that already
>       // are added to the queue. This prevents loosing messages when using
>       // aggregators.
>       if (firstVertexMessage != null) {
>         peer.send(peer.getPeerName(), firstVertexMessage);
>       }
>       GraphJobMessage msg = null;
>       while ((msg = peer.getCurrentMessage()) != null) {
>         peer.send(peer.getPeerName(), msg);
>       }
>       // now sync
>       peer.sync();
>       ...
> {code}
> Should we do some improvement here? Record the original receiveQueue before 
> the sync, and after sync operation, read the aggregator updated value 
> firstly, then restore the original receiveQueue such that avoiding the 
> message resending operations.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to