[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-849?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13872817#comment-13872817
]
Hudson commented on HAMA-849:
-----------------------------
SUCCESS: Integrated in Hama-Nightly-for-Hadoop-2.x #149 (See
[https://builds.apache.org/job/Hama-Nightly-for-Hadoop-2.x/149/])
HAMA-849: No need to use sorted queue for outgoingQueue (edwardyoon: rev
1558248)
*
/hama/trunk/core/src/main/java/org/apache/hama/bsp/message/queue/SortedMemoryQueueTransfer.java
> No need to use sorted queue for outgoingQueue
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HAMA-849
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-849
> Project: Hama
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: bsp core, graph
> Affects Versions: 0.6.3
> Reporter: Edward J. Yoon
> Assignee: Edward J. Yoon
> Fix For: 0.7.0
>
> Attachments: HAMA-849.patch
>
>
> Basically message transfer protocol provides senderQueue and receiverQueue
> separately. Since only incoming queue should be sorted, there's no need to
> use sorted queue for outgoingQueue.
> In graphJobRunner case, we can use diskqueue and sortedqueue to reduce the
> memory usage until sorted spilling queue is implemented.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)
