[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-913?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14089160#comment-14089160
]
ByungSeok Min commented on HAMA-913:
------------------------------------
I also think the same as netty guys.
Netty is so good for hama rpc.
(i'll perform additional test with other environment or case)
In addition,
So we need to consider together not only the improvement of RPC itself also
improvement of related modules,
I think we need to improve RPC performance continuously.
As part of it, I am also looking at improvements to the objects that is used by
RPC in order to enhance the performance of Hama.
(ex, conversion overhead between Writable and message/stream/etc )
I think the performance of the RPC will be better if we improve this part.
I'll think some more and register the improvement.
> Adding Implementation of RPC
> ----------------------------
>
> Key: HAMA-913
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-913
> Project: Hama
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: bsp core
> Affects Versions: 0.6.4
> Reporter: ByungSeok Min
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: core, messaging, netty
> Fix For: 0.7.0
>
> Attachments: HAMA-913-v01.patch, HAMA-913-v02.patch,
> HAMA-913-v03.patch
>
>
> The current RPC server code is too complex and there are some unnecessary code
> So, It seems good to add implementation of RPC such as netty
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
