Alexey Varlamov wrote: > 2006/11/24, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> So how about we implement Security#registerDRLProviders() (maybe with a >> method name change) to register: >> >> security.provider.1=org.apache.harmony.security.provider.cert.DRLCertFactory >> >> security.provider.2=org.apache.harmony.security.provider.crypto.CryptoProvider >> >> security.provider.3=org.apache.harmony.xnet.provider.jsse.JSSEProvider >> security.provider.4=org.bouncycastle.jce.provider.BouncyCastleProvider >> >> Thoughts? >> Tim > > Well, there is a number of other sensitive keys without hardcoded > defaults, e.g. package.access, probably bunch of ssl.* keys. Therefore > I presume it should be Security#defaultConfig() then.
Sorry, I wasn't clear. There is already a method called Security#registerDRLProviders() that does nothing. I suggest that we implement it as I described above. There may well be other properties that need a default value, but they would be fixed elsewhere -- presumably where they are used, in case the file exists but does not define those properties any more. If you agree with the default providers I can make that change. Regards, Tim -- Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) IBM Java technology centre, UK.
