Oleg Khaschansky wrote:
That's a moot question ... GPF-ing is unacceptable known behavior.
I am not sure if we should guarantee the correct behavior in case of
invalid system configuration, missing libraries, etc. Should we?
That's not what Tim said - he said that GPF-ing (I almost wrote
"GPL-ing") is unacceptable, and we can handle that error in ways better
than just falling over dead.
geir
On 11/24/06, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Oleg Khaschansky wrote:
> Do you suggest to introduce the error handling for all the wrappers or
> only for this one? If for all, do you think if it will affect the
> performance?
That's a moot question ... GPF-ing is unacceptable known behavior.
> The only place is that native code :) I need some time to find out if
> it is possible to get the tool which generated it to harmony.
That's ok, I was just respecting the source file comment. Since we have
what we have in harmony I'll edit it directly.
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
IBM Java technology centre, UK.
