Some time ago when we discuss issue fixing policy some people vote to fix failed tests/implementation ASAP instead of reverting changes back. But nobody define the exact time for 'ASAP' :) If the issue requires 1 week for investigation should we wait for fix? I think no.
And here we have 2 options: if the test is new - it should be excluded, if the test is old - update should be reverted. thanks, Vladimir On 11/28/06, Mikhail Loenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What does "under consideration" mean? We need to fix or roll them back ASAP otherwise we will end with all the tests sitting in the exclude lists Thanks, Mikhail 2006/11/28, Vladimir Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Could we just exclude test while it is under investigation? > In this case we will see only one notification for each failure. > > Thanks, Valdimir > > > On 11/28/06, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > > > Each of us can use filters to sort them, but it seems like it wouldn't > > > be a bad idea having a separate list for this kind of thing. comments? > > > > I'm happy enough for them to be on the commit list, but as you wrote > > elsewhere we need to stop getting repeated messages for the same failed > > state (these are being worked on). > > > > Regards, > > Tim > > > > -- > > > > Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > > IBM Java technology centre, UK. > > > >
