committed in r480026 2006/11/28, Mikhail Loenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
how about this:@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ <!-- ================================= target: -compile ================================= --> - <target name="-compile" depends="-prepare-depends"> + <target name="-compile" depends="-prepare-depends, -layout"> @@ -168,10 +167,19 @@ <src path="modules/x-net/src/main/java/" /> <classpath> - <fileset dir="${depends.jars}"> + <fileset dir="${hy.jdk}/jre/lib/boot"> <include name="**/*.jar" /> </fileset> We do copying first. As a result we don't have to mantain one more list 2006/11/28, Mikhail Loenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > 2006/11/28, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Mikhail Loenko wrote: > > > classpath has both xerces 2.6.2 and xerces 2.8.0. 2.6.2 goes first. > > > > > > If I remove 2.6.2 from depends it builds OK. I noticed that there are > > > also other > > > old versions of depends that are still there. How do we handle them? > > > > ah ha. Yeah, good point. At the moment we take 'depends/**/*.jar' onto > > the classpath, and when we update versions we don't explicitly require > > people to delete the older versions. > > > > The fix is to list the dependencies that we have in a fileset, rather > > than picking up all the JARs. It means there is one more place to > > update when we have a new dependency, but at least it is explicit I guess. > > > > So I'm guessing that the roll-back fixed things for you because that is > > now picking up the 'wrong' JRE JARs again, which happen to have the JARs > > you need! So can you please put back the fixed build-java.xml? > > OK, sure > > > > > > Thanks > > Tim > > > > -- > > > > Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > > IBM Java technology centre, UK. > > >
