I've looked through "Known issues" page and dropped few items, which were resolved already: - Java assertions support - StackOverflowError support for JIT mode
Also, I suggest we remove "Limited length of buffer for reading of vm.properties lines" item along with the related code. There is a comment "this functionality is deprecated" presented for ages, and I never heard that anybody actually used it. Anyway there is similar "harmonyvm.properties" functionality and it has no such limitation. 2006/12/3, Konovalova, Svetlana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>-----Original Message----- >From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 5:35 PM >To: dev@harmony.apache.org >Subject: Re: [doc] are KNOWN ISSUES and TODO items valid? > >Might I suggest that instead of asking for everyone to comment for >positive, please comment only for negative with the idea that we can >then discuss and then leave there (w/o comment) or remove. OK, I don't mind. > > >I just thing that it will result in a big list of "+1" that don't seem >to add much but visual clutter. > > >I've reviewed the TODO, and each has my virtual +1 :) Great! Thanks! > >geir > Best regards, Sveta >> >>Konovalova, Svetlana wrote: >> Folks, >>I found out that certain KNOWN ISSUES and TODO items mentioned in the earlier version of the README file are posted nowhere, though they might be relevant. >> I've collected them and have added to the following wiki pages: >>[1] http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/KnownNonBugIssuesAndLimitations (Known Issues) >> [2] http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/TODO_Items (TODO) >> >> Would be great, if you could find a chance to review the issues to determine their validity. >> >> IMHO if there is significant info, it should be replaced, let's say, to the README. >> >> Thanks in advance! >> >> Best regards, >> Sveta >> >>
