wow -- it's bigger than I thought, 78Mb. P'haps I'll move it over to /standard/tools/Wink otherwise it will be impossible to work with the website over a slow connection.
Objections? Tim Tim Ellison wrote: > ok, sounds like we all agree -- I'll checkin. > > Regards, > Tim > > Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: >> that's exactly what I meant >> >> geir >> >> >> Morozova, Nadezhda wrote: >>>> I actually can't come up w/ a better idea - maybe we just filter it out >>>> of the copy to doc/ >>> This can actually be done easily. The movie is not processed as usual. >>> There's an xml with a link to swf. So we can keep the source and the swf >>> in xdocs and only swf in docs. what do you say? >>> >>> Cheers, Nadya >>> >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 8:12 PM >>>> To: dev@harmony.apache.org >>>> Subject: Re: [doc] Authors of dev_eclipse movie needed! >>>> >>>> I actually can't come up w/ a better idea - maybe we just filter it out >>>> of the copy to doc/ >>>> >>>> geir >>>> >>>> >>>> Tim Ellison wrote: >>>>> Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: >>>>>> Tim Ellison wrote: >>>>>>> I'm happy to upload the wnk file so it can be edited -- I guess the >>>> best >>>>>>> place is in xdocs/images ? i.e. next to the swf file. Unless there >>> are >>>>>>> better suggestions I'll drop it into there. >>>>>> There's probably a better place so it's not swept out to docs/images >>> and >>>>>> the site? >>>>> I thought of that too (which is why it is not there yet), but believe >>> it >>>>> should be close to where it is used. I'm open to suggestions. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Tim >
