On 12/13/06, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Vladimir Ivanov wrote: > Actually, it is exclude.list update. We have some issues related to > this test and some of them already fixed but the test still > intermittently failed for me. Understood, but I'd prefer if our first reaction was to see if it is easily fixable rather than throw it in the exclude list. Of course, if the evaluation is that it is a tricky problem, then we can exclude it but somebody is going to have to go back and release the tests from this gaol at some point.
Agreed and do it for tests that failed first time. But this test has a big history and long discussions so I prefer to exclude it and wait for fix from our networks guru. thanks, Vladimir Regards,
Tim
