Hmm... Sorry for a dumber question. Do I understand correctly that I should hardcode the test name in <target name="run-reg-tests"> in build/make/targets/reg.test.run.xml?
This just doesn't look quite extensible for me. I believe we should select tests using some Ant selector, not just one by one. On 12/15/06, Alexei Fedotov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alexander, regression test gurus, > What can be better for developer than an ability to see all > regression tests passing after new fix :) I want to get this joy and currently am trying to create a regression test. Here is my question: $ grep package regression/H1694/H1694.java package org.apache.harmony.drlvm.tests.regression.h1694; Do I understand correctly that directory name should be lowercased since a pakage name is in lowercase? Or do you prefer to have direcory name in mixed case? Thanks! On 14 Dec 2006 16:17:02 +0600, Egor Pasko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 to commit the regression test infrastructure update > > On the 0x23E day of Apache Harmony Alexander Kleymenov wrote: > > Hello, > > > > It's glad to see that people are staring to use regression testing > > framework. What can be better for developer than an ability to see all > > regression tests passing after new fix :) > > > > Now I see only one problem with framework - its pending state. Its > > life in the form of 2 patches supplied with different JIRA reports > > complicates the works on regression tests suite - both on integrating > > of existing regression tests and on development of new ones. > > So, perhaps, someone of committers could look at the patches and > > integrate the framework? I believe it will help to accelerate the > > works on regression test suite and as a result can make DRLVM more > > robust and stable. If someone found this interesting (and/or obvious > > as well) the patches implementing the framework are supplied with > > HARMONY-2416 and HARMONY-2540 JIRA reports. Plus there is a small bug > > fix implemented by Egor and supplied with HARMONY-2565 report. > > I think there is no need to dig too deep into all these Ant's > > implementation details - if there are any problems they can be fixed > > later, in parallel with regression test suite development. Everything > > you need to check it up is applying the patches (first 2416, then > > 2540) on built DRLVM workspace and trying "ant reg.test". > > > > Thank you, > > Alexander Kleymenov > > > > -- > Egor Pasko > > -- With best regards, Alexei, ESSD, Intel
-- With best regards, Alexei, ESSD, Intel
