On 12/18/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How could the window be closed manually with the automated framework?
It was fully automated until HARMONY-1925 had been committed. After that setting -Dvm.assert_dialog=0 in smoke.test.xml stopped working and assert dialogs might pop up. This has just been fixed in HARMONY-2763 (-D replaced with -XD). Elena geir
Elena Semukhina wrote: > On 12/18/06, Evgueni Brevnov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> On 12/18/06, Elena Semukhina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > On 12/18/06, Vladimir Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > >> > > The other problem, even with this return code the 'build test' >> reports >> > > SUCCESSFUL status :( >> > >> > >> > Possibly it is SUCCESSFUL because some assert dialogs appeared and have >> ?> been closed manually. >> No. The build is successful because all tests are actually passed. >> Current mechanism doesn't use java result to determine if the test is >> passed or not. Instead it looks into log file for a "PASSED" or >> "FAILED" key word to decide if test was successful. > > > If the Assert dialog window is closed manually, "PASSED" could be > written to > the log file. > > Elena > > Evgueni >> >> After HARMONY-1925 has been applied, we should pass >> > internal VM properties with -XD option. The vm.assert_dialogproperty=0 >> is >> > still passed with -D. I created >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-2763 with patch for >> > smoke.test.xml. >> >> >> >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Elena >> > >> > Thanks, Vladimir >> > > >> > > PS Should we exclude this test if it failed time-to-time for ~month? >> > > >> > > On 12/18/06, Evgueni Brevnov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > > >> > > > Hi, >> > > > >> > > > The only suspicious place is "[exec] [java] Java Result: >> -1073741819". >> > > > I've observed such behaviour from time to time for a one month at >> > > > least."[exec][java] Java Result: 1" & "[exec][java] Java Result: >> 130" >> > > > are expected results. >> > > > >> > > > Evgueni >> > > > >> > > > On 12/18/06, Vladimir Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > > > The smoke tests of DRLVM failed today on the WindowsXP. Could >> somebody >> > > > > reproduce/fix it? >> > > > > >> > > > > Thanks, Vladimir >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> C:\cc.harmony\trunk\cc\projects\drlvm\trunk\build\make\excludes\exclude.drlvm_smoke.windows.x86.jit >> >> > > > > <snip> >> > > > > [exec] [echo] PASSED : perf.CreateManyExceptions_depth >> > > > > [exec] [java] Java Result: -1073741819 >> > > > > [exec] [echo] PASSED : perf.MultiThreadsSimple >> > > > > [exec] [echo] PASSED : perf.SeveralThreads >> > > > > [exec] [echo] PASSED : perf.StressCornerSize >> > > > > [exec] [echo] PASSED : perf.StressCornerSize_a >> > > > > [exec] [echo] PASSED : perf.ThrowMany >> > > > > [exec] [echo] PASSED : perf.ThrowManyExceptions >> > > > > [exec] [echo] PASSED : perf.ThrowManyExceptions_depth >> > > > > [exec] [echo] PASSED : perf.ThrowMany_depth >> > > > > [exec] [echo] PASSED : reflect.GetMethod >> > > > > [exec] [java] Java Result: 1 >> > > > > [exec] [echo] PASSED : shutdown.TestFatalError >> > > > > [exec] [java] Java Result: 130 >> > > > > [exec] [echo] PASSED : shutdown.TestInterrupt >> > > > > [exec] [echo] PASSED : shutdown.TestLock >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Thanks, >> > Elena >> > >> > >> > > >
-- Thanks, Elena
