I've submitted another improved version of scripts to JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-2359 Examples are on wiki page: http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/Unresolved_Bugs_History
Now scripts shows proportions of bugs by module for each component (not classlib only) and generates lists of bugs, summary of which does not conform to "[component][module] summary..." format. Thanks, Aleksei. Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > >Tony Wu wrote: >> Good job! >> So many unresloved bugs. Seems there is a long way to go. >> I have a suggestion but not the requirement. What about classify the >> classlib related issuses by module name, accoding to the JIRA title. >> You know, the title follows the format [classlib][modulename]Content. > >Not a bad idea - and also, flag the JIRA's that aren't correctly titled >so we can fix them. > >geir > >> >> On 12/6/06, Ivaschenko, Aleksei V <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Hi! >>> >>> I've updated scripts for generating indicators of unresolved Harmony >>> bugs: >>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-2359 >>> >>> Now scripts can generate separate indicators for "Classlib", "DRLVM", >>> "VM" and "Contributions" Harmony components showing the proportions of >>> their unresolved bugs by priority. Find the examples of indicators on >>> wiki page: >>> >>> http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/Unresolved_Bugs_History >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Aleksei
