Actually we can :)

On 12/21/06, Alexey Varlamov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Should we maintain both annotated and throw-style pragmas?

2006/12/21, Mikhail Fursov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi Robin!
> I'm glad to hear that we will have a small and thin jar instead of the
old
> one.
> I'm going to provide a patch for our build system right after you put a
> release to the official vmmagic site.
> The only incompatibility I see is that we have to use annotations to use
new
> vmmagic code (we use 'throws'-like markers now). I'll fix it too.
>
>
> BTW the correct URL is vmmagic.sf.net, isn't it?
> BTW2 is the new vmmagic interface (I mean annotations) is the same as
used
> in JikesRVM? IMO we want to be compatible here.
>
> On 12/21/06, Robin Garner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > We have just about finished the latest version of vmmagic, and those
> > interested can download a snapshot from
> >
> >    http://cs.anu.edu.au/people/Robin.Garner/vmmagic-20061221.jar
> >
> > This will become available at vmmagic.org in the next few days.
> >
> > The principal change from the previous version is that pragmas are now
> > Annotations.  Comments and feedback are welcome.
> >
> > cheers,
> > Robin
> >
> > --
> > Robin Garner
> > Dept. of Computer Science
> > Australian National University
> > http://cs.anu.edu.au/people/Robin.Garner/
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Mikhail Fursov
>
>




--
Mikhail Fursov

Reply via email to