On 12/25/06, Tony Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So, you mean it is ok to consider them as non-bug difference and there
is no need to follow RI.
+1. I think if it fails TCK or breaks legacy applications, let's fix it.:)
On 12/25/06, Alexey Petrenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think that exception order not so important. And if the order change
> will give us performance boost then let's change it!
>
> 2006/12/23, Tony Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Hi Andrew,
> > Thanks for your advice: )
> >
> > Yes, it is impl detail, but this is one kind of problem. Thus I yelled
> > here for getting an agreement to deal with similar problems.
> >
> > I do incline to follow RI in normal case if possible, but harmony's
> > impl is better here.
> > I wonder is it worth doing this trade-off?
> >
> > On 12/23/06, Andrew Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 12/23/06, Tony Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > There are two methods, which throw exceptions in different order.
> > > >
> > > > public test1(int a, int b){
> > > > if(a>b){
> > > > throw AException();
> > > > }
> > > > synchronized(obj){
> > > > if(blabla){
> > > > throw BException();
> > > > }
> > > > }
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > public test2(int a, int b){
> > > > synchronized(obj){
> > > > if(blabla){
> > > > throw BException();
> > > > }
> > > > if(a>b){
> > > > throw AException();
> > > > }
> > > > }
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > test1 checks the parameters before entering the synchronized
block, It
> > > > returns immediately instead of waiting for a lock in the condition
> > > > which should throw AException. IMHO, test1 is more elegant. The
> > > > problem is, if RI do something like the test2 where harmony using
> > > > test1, should we follow RI here? What's your opinion?
> > >
> > >
> > > I think it's implementation detail, and I vote for following RI if
possible.
> > >
> > > We may discuss specific case one by one. :)
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Tony Wu
> > > > China Software Development Lab, IBM
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best regards,
> > > Andrew Zhang
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Tony Wu
> > China Software Development Lab, IBM
> >
>
--
Tony Wu
China Software Development Lab, IBM
--
Best regards,
Andrew Zhang
