On Dec 27, 2006, at 10:48 AM, Alexey Petrenko wrote:
2006/12/27, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Dec 27, 2006, at 10:36 AM, Ivanov, Alexey A wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2006 6:26 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [build] Downloading dependencies
>>
>> Wait - you can't just remove all reference to this - you need
to also
>> copy from wherever into jdk/jre/bin so that things still work.
>> Otherwise, any user building the classlib and dropping in J9 (for
>> example) will have a problem.
>
> If one built classlib, there's the DLL in system32. When one will
> run an
> application, the classlib natives will link to the DLL in system32.
>
> I see no problem here.
What if you don't build it?
> But we need to include the DLL into snapshots so that users who
don't
> have the DLL are able to run application on top of Harmony.
Yes, exactly. My point.
But that will be the problem of next snapshot...
And you are snapshot build creator...
Could you please add copying system32 to snapshot build?
I thought that we agreed on this...
No, we didn't agree on this.
You suggested that I do what's necessary in the federated build, and
I will, but I really think that not doing it in classlibrary is a
problem, because some people just work in classlibrary, and it's
concievable that they run the hdk packaging target in the
classlibrary build, and it would be nice if what they got from that
was complete.
geir
From: Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 25.12.2006 15:11
Subject: Re: [build] Downloading dependencies
On Dec 25, 2006, at 4:47 AM, Alexey Petrenko wrote:
> OK, I'll remove msvcr71.dll dependency from class library.
> Geir, could you add it to federated build?
Yes, I suppose that's the right place to deal with the problem,
although since people can simply get a HDK and drop a VM into it
there for testing.... don't we need it in the classlib build as well?
SY, Alexey
