Elena Semukhina wrote:
It was me who removed stress.Mix from the exclude lists together with some
more tests because all they passed for me even when running many times on
Windows 2003, SUSE9 linux ia32, and SUSE9 linux em64t. It was at the end of
November.
CC started failing intermittently on stress.Mix (SUSE9, em64t) on December,
18 and was excluded for that platform (HARMONY-2772).
stress.Mix still passes for me now on SUSE9 linux ia32 and em64t (both are
2xXeon x64 machines) while megaSpawn crashes with Segmentation fault on
em64t and hangs on ia32 after printing a lot of messages like the
following:
java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Failed to create new thread
I've just reproduced 3 different failures of MegaSpawn on windows 2003
server (P4 with HT). It may crash somewhere in calling APR because of a
NULL pointer access, it may crash on assertion that STD_MALLOC (which is
actually a define for malloc) returns non-NULL, and it hangs on shutdown.
So it seems windows has the same problems that are present on Linux.
Thanks,
Elena
On 1/9/07, Weldon Washburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 1/8/07, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 8, 2007, at 1:20 PM, Weldon Washburn wrote:
>
> > On 1/8/07, Rana Dasgupta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 1/7/07, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > >What is in the backlog?
> >> >
> >> > >I was testing on em64t dual core, and it failed there too.
> >>
> >>
> >> Which one failed in 64 bit mode? The basic stress.Mix or Weldon's
> >> MegaSpawn?
> >> And did it hang, or run out of memory? Running out of memory on
> >> these 64
> >> bit
> >> systems is not easy even under the conditions of this test.
> >>
> >> >I think we broke something basic. By just ignoring it and
> >> continuing
> >> > >with commits that are related, it seems like we're going going
> >> to get
> >> > >in deeper trouble...
> >>
> >>
> >> I am a little confused too. The stress.Mix test can randomly land
> >> up doing
> >> unbounded thread creation( as in Weldon's repro case )...and I
> >> would think
> >> that it is not unreasonable to fail in such a case. The RI fails
> >> too. But
> >> I
> >> don't understand how it never failed before.
> >>
> >>
> > I attempted to determine if there ever was an old svn revision that
> > would
> > pass stress.Mix test on my rhel 2-way SMP box. Unfortunately the
> > unified
> > classlib/vm build changed the how one gets an old revision from the
> > repository. I don't know if its worth trying to resurect an old svn
> > revision. I am hoping someone will confirm if stress.Mix ever ran
> > successfully on 2-way and 4-way boxes. This seems way easier than
> > trying to
> > reconstruct old build.xml files.
>
> Huh?
>
> Why do you think you need to reconstruct anything?
Its a moot point. Naveen got the answers for us already.
geir
>
>
--
Weldon Washburn
Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division
--
Gregory
