-----Original Message-----
From: Mikhail Loenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 12:20 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [doc][drlvm] roadmap for DRLVM

2007/1/11, Konovalova, Svetlana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> IMHO it makes sense to add a link from [1] to [2].
>>
>>>I suggest to move content of the wiki page to the website
>> The content changes all the time, ant it's easier to edit wiki pages
>> than site ones...
>
>Why DRLVM is different? We have all other components roadmap on the web
>site
>asnd it would be logical to have all them in a single style
>
>Moreover the set of links (categories of items) looks rather stable:
>
>Core VM Development Items
>JIT Development Tasks
>Known non bug issues and limitations.
>kernel classes/natives code sharing.
>TODO Items
>Documentation TODO
>
>So the items themselves (that change indeed) would be on a wiki
anyway...
 

Oops, I thought you proposed to move wiki pages to the site... sorry for
confusing you.

+1 for adding the links.  


Best regards,
Sveta

Thanks,
Mikhail

>
> Best regards,
> Sveta
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mikhail Loenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 10:30 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [doc][drlvm] roadmap for DRLVM
>
> I've noticed that we have some duplication: there is a placeholder for
> DRLVM
> roadmap [1] that is empty on the web site. And there is a roadmap on
> the wiki [2].
> I suggest to move content of the wiki page to the website
>
> Does anybody object?
>
> Thanks,
> Mikhail
>
> [1] http://harmony.apache.org/roadmap.html#DRLVM
> [2] http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/TODO_List_for_DRLVM
>

Reply via email to