On Jan 23, 2007, at 10:25 AM, Tim Ellison wrote:
Alexey Petrenko wrote:
2007/1/17, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
so what do we do? I'm hoping that we can find a way to achieve this
w/o us having to have "shadow" or duplicate code here...
That would be great. Can you suggest something?
As Alexey wrote, the level of CORBA support in the RI 5.0 [1] is
predominantly 2.3.1 based. However, we are free to implement a later
version of the Corba spec and still be compliant since the CORBA
code is
an "endorsed standard" (see [2]).
This is Really Useful Information(tm). Thank you.
In this case I suggest we support Yoko in their goal of implementing
corba 2.4 (and ignore the JAPI diffs).
+1
(And lets remember this if we need to file a challenge when we get
the JCK :)
geir
[1] http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/idl/compliance.html
[2] http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/README.html
Regards,
Tim
