2007/2/2, Naveen Neelakantam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Feb 2, 2007, at 9:42 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > > On Feb 2, 2007, at 10:35 AM, Alexey Petrenko wrote: > >> I've faced the following problem while reviewing suggested patches: >> the patches does not have descriptions. It is easy to understand the >> patch if it is doing something simple. Like parameters check. >> But in more complicated cases description would be great. >> >> So I vote for including patch description requirement to the "Good >> issue resolution guideline" [1]. >> >> Any concerns or objections? >> > > None. And besides documenting it, feel free to push back on > patches that don't have good descriptions. Before an issue is pushed back, could an email be sent to the reporter? Or maybe a comment could be placed in the JIRA saying that the issue is being pushed back?
Sure! SY, Alexey
I am *trying* to be helpful when I report bugs, but if I'm doing a bad job I want someone to let me know. It's hard to change if you don't know something is wrong. Naveen > geir > >> SY, Alexey >> >> [1] http://harmony.apache.org/issue_resolution_guideline.html >
