Kalpak Gadre wrote: > I was just trying identify if it was not as straight forward as I thought, > and I was stupid enough to miss it.
Understood -- there are a few places where the spec is ambiguous or incomplete, and in those cases we would create tests against the API to figure out the RI behavior. > Having read ACQ I have a question, does it mean that I cannot further > continue my work on extcheck? Considering I tried to understand the code? > Even if I make sure that I implement it purely as per my understanding? Take a look at the ACQ [1], since it is hard to summarise all the possible scenarios here. In general, it is best to avoid studying implementations that are not made available under a recognized open source license. To make the process manageable the ACQ breaks down the Harmony project into different components, so even if you are not in a position to contribute code for tools it is likely that you can contribute to Harmony in other areas. Your responses to the questionnaire will determine that. Regards, Tim
