Hi everyone, I have been working on implementing persistence for HttpURLConnections and working with Alexander Kleymenov to make sure it's properly tested. We're currently discussing one of the tests that Alexander wrote to test persistent connections throught a proxy if anyone would like to join in. Please see HARMONY-617 for details.
Alexander - in the HttpConnectionManager I currently use proxy, host name and port to uniquely identify a connection but it seems from your test like the RI just uses host name and port. I think it shouldn't be too difficult to switch to do the same, so I will do that unless anyone has any objections. Thanks, Sian On 15/02/07, Tim Ellison (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-617?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12473332] Tim Ellison commented on HARMONY-617: ------------------------------------- (please move ths conversation onto the dev list) > [classlib][luni] HttpURLConnection does not support persistent connections > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HARMONY-617 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-617 > Project: Harmony > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Classlib > Reporter: Alexander Kleymenov > Assigned To: Paulex Yang > Attachments: luni.patch, luni2.patch, patch-test2.txt, test.patch > > > Current HttpURLConnection does not support persistent connections while RI implementation does. > Implementation of this mechanism will allow sufficiently increase the performance of network applications based on HttpURLConnections. To make Harmony's implementation more attractive for use this support SHALL be implemented. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
-- Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
