On Feb 19, 2007, at 11:26 AM, Gregory Shimansky wrote:
Ivan Zvolsky wrote:
I have also put my efforts with drlvm building to HARMONY-3196.
The patch
makes drlvm buildable on windows/em64t (and shouldn't break
building on
other platforms).
It still has some things to do, which I described in subtasks for
HARMONY-3196.
I looked at the patches and I have a question. You've added amd64
architecture in some select statements in the build along with
em64t flag. I thought that from the build point they are
equivalent, and build.arch property is defined in build.xml for all
kinds of arch (x86_64, em64t, amd64) to be equal to "em64t". Why
add another flag in build files?
And whatever the answer turns out to be, can we instead simply settle
on x86_64 please?
geir
On 2/16/07, Ivan Zvolsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
Some time ago, I found out that Harmony is not buildable on
Windows /
x86_64 (EM64T).
I tried to reanimate at least the build which has required to
update both
classlib and drlvm build files, create stubs for some functions,
etc.
I've put my results (for now only classlib part) to HARMONY-3188.
Could someone take a look? The comments are welcome.
In particular, Geir might want to look at the first comment in the
description :)
Thanks,
Ivan
--
Gregory
