On Mar 5, 2007, at 8:35 AM, Morozova, Nadezhda wrote:
Geir,
I've a question. Many of our web pages are made up of html that is
doc-included into xml and then processed. If the initial html has a
disclaimer in it, the resulting web-page has 2 of them in the source -
one added during processing, one inherited from source html.
Does this issue overweigh the fact that every file should have the
disclaimer?
I think that it's oK to have two on the generated output, as we want
anything in SVN to have that license header.
geir
Cheers,
Nadya
-----Original Message-----
From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 4:31 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [website][doc] Harmony site inconsistency
You did it backwards :)
We need that disclaimer in all files. So don't remove from the files
that have it, but rather add to the ones that don't.
geir
On Mar 5, 2007, at 6:08 AM, Konovalova, Svetlana wrote:
AFAIU, we need to remove the disclaimer from certain files.
To make docs from the xdocs>subcomponents directory consistent,
I've created a patch and have opened a new JIRA issue [1].
Would be fine if someone could find time to have a look.
Best regards,
Sveta
[1] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-3296
-----Original Message-----
From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2007 2:36 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [website][doc] Harmony site inconsistency
Yes, they should be consistent.
geir
On Feb 16, 2007, at 7:00 AM, Konovalova, Svetlana wrote:
Folks,
Looking through the docs from the xdocs>subcomponents directory, I
found
out that some of them, such as DevGuide.html, AWT.html,
DNSSupport.html
etc have the Apache Software Foundation disclaimer in the very
beginning, while EM.html, Jitrino.html, Jitrino.PMF.html,
RMIProvider.html don't. Where is the truth? :)
Don't we need the disclaimer since these are harmony materials
already?
Thanks in advance.
Best regards,
Sveta
