On Mar 6, 2007, at 10:52 AM, Rana Dasgupta wrote:
My thought was that if we have a JIRA related "discussion" on the
list, the
intent is possibly to invite more comments, not just from the
submitter and
reviewer. If one feels that this broader participation or interest is
necessary, it may be a good idea for whoever posts it on the list
to add a
few words to provide some context and background on the problem, which
should not be hard to do. Otherwise, the discussion stays closed.
But I think that we always want to invite broader participation and
interest. if people bite, great. If they don't, no harm done.
I actually engaged on weldons question, looking at what he was
talking about. I hate reading through JIRa comments :)
geir
On 3/6/07, Salikh Zakirov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Rana Dasgupta wrote:
> IMHO we may be better off if we post brief discussions on
> commits/reviews on
> the JIRA, rather than on the list, unless it is an architectural
issue
or
> one where several opinions could add value. There seem to be
several
> threads
> where the entire thread consists of a single post and a
response :-)
Rana,
there is nothing wrong in a single post and a response, because the
purpose of
harmony-dev posting is to discuss things *in public*, rather than
having
hot
discussions all the time.
Should Weldon posted his comment in JIRA, I would probably miss it.
And, by the way, using locks *is* an architectural issue.
