Now I see. I missed "instead of" in Vladimir's message. Thanks!
Mikhail 2007/3/12, Alexei Zakharov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
As far as I understand Vladimir's question was should we include intermittently failed test by default and exclude them only if a special switch is given or vice versa. I.e. about the build switch semantics. Personally I don't care. Just be prepared to possible failures and ready to run recently donated script :) Regards, 2007/3/12, Mikhail Loenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > IIRC we agreed to exclude intermittently failing tests from CC (to > avoid false alarms) > and to include them to pre-commit testing (to benmefit from other > valid tests that are excluded in the same bundle) > > Thanks, > Mikhail > > 2007/3/12, Vladimir Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hello everyone, > > I want to discuss issue 3352 while it changes the current behavior of > > excluding policy for intermittently failed tests. I suggest running > > intermittently failed test by default. So the resulting exclude list > > by default will be combined as common + platform instead of common + > > platform + intermittent. > > Is it OK? > > > > thanks, Vladimir > > > -- Alexei Zakharov, Intel ESSD
