On Mar 14, 2007, at 5:35 PM, Nathan Beyer wrote:
I apologize for the delay response, I've been a little busy lately.
Hey, we all are.
I ran the test on Sun JRE 5 Update 11 and Sun JRE 6 and this bit of
the getI test failed as well.
// Regression test for Hamrony-2959
Date date = new Date(Date.parse("Jan 15 00:00:01 GMT 2000"));
GregorianCalendar gc = new GregorianCalendar();
gc.setGregorianChange(date);
gc.setTimeInMillis(Date.parse("Dec 24 00:00:01 GMT 2000"));
assertEquals(346, gc.get(Calendar.DAY_OF_YEAR));
The failure was exactly the same.
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected:<346> but was:<345>
I tried running the [1] snippet below, but I had to change
'Calendar.Date' to 'Calendar.DATE'. I presume this was just a quick
typo. The output of this when I run it on the same Sun JREs as
mentioned above is 23.
Any idea why it used to work?
geir
-Nathan
On 3/12/07, Tony Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Nathan,
This testcase passes on my winxp sp2 and ubuntu with ibm vme, besides
our build system on debian. I can not reproduce it and IIRC there is
no DST in Dec and Jan. Could you pls help me to verify whether it
passes on RI and the output of code[1] and the testcase[2]. Thanks a
lot.
[1]
Date date = new Date(Date.parse("Jan 15 00:00:01 GMT 2000"));
GregorianCalendar gc = new GregorianCalendar();
gc.setGregorianChange(date);
gc.setTimeInMillis(Date.parse("Dec 24 00:00:01 GMT 2000"));
System.out.println(gc.get(Calendar.Date));
[2]
Date date = new Date(Date.parse("Jan 15 00:00:01 GMT 2000"));
GregorianCalendar gc = new GregorianCalendar();
gc.setGregorianChange(date);
gc.setTimeInMillis(Date.parse("Dec 24 12:00:01 GMT 2000"));
System.out.println(gc.get(Calendar.Date));
assertEquals(346, gc.get(Calendar.DAY_OF_YEAR));
On 3/12/07, Nathan Beyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I hope not.
>
> According to my Win2K builds, this test has failed since 3/7
through
> today, so it seems to consistently fail.
>
> -Nathan
>
> On 3/11/07, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Heh - did we have some problem w/ DST?
> >
> > geir
> >
> > On Mar 11, 2007, at 3:10 PM, Nathan Beyer wrote:
> >
> > > I'm seeing a consistent failure for this unit test on WinXP and
> > > Win2000 on the IBM VM. Should this test be excluded or at
least the
> > > method disabled?
> > >
> > > test_getI Failure expected:<346> but was:<345>
> > >
> > > -Nathan
> >
> >
>
--
Tony Wu
China Software Development Lab, IBM
