Thanks for testing this. I'll have to try committing again later. Right
now, I am focused on getting 3288 and 3289 successfully committed.
On 3/16/07, Pavel Pervov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
No I do not. Smoke tests has just passed for me on Windows ia32.
Does OPT fails due to added assertion?
Pavel.
On 3/15/07, Weldon Washburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> hmm... the new patch failed smoke tests on both windows32 and linux32
> rhel4.0 with "jitrino.OPT FAILED". I looked at the reports directory
and
> see that a wait for notify test has failed. Pavel, do you see the same
> problem?
>
>
>
>
> On 3/13/07, Pavel Pervov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Second line of class_alloc_new_object asserts
> > '!hythread_is_suspend_enabled()'. So, yes, we can assume the
condition.
> >
> > The line to add is something like
> > 'assert(struct_Class_to_java_lang_Class());' to remove it in release.
> >
> > WBR,
> > Pavel.
> >
> >
> > On 3/12/07, Weldon Washburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Looking at just the procedure named, class_alloc_new_object(), the
> > assert
> > > definitely looks wrong. However, I think the patch ignores the
intent
> > of
> > > the assert. I think the developer intended to somehow assert that
the
> > > input
> > > arg, a ptr to struct Class, is valid. In other words the original
> > intent
> > > is
> > > to do something like:
> > >
> > >
> > > assert(c);
> > >
> > > ManagedObject** hjlc = c->get_class_handle();
> > >
> > > assert(hjlc);
> > >
> > > ManagedObject* jlc = *hjlc;
> > >
> > > assert(jlc != NULL);
> > >
> > > assert(jlc->vt());
> > >
> > > assert(jlc->vt()->clss ==
> > > VM_Global_State::loader_env->JavaLangClass_Class);
> > >
> > > assert(java_lang_Class_to_struct_Class(jlc) == clss); // else clss's
> > > java.lang.Class had a bad "back" pointer
> > > Note that I stole all the above code from the existing function
> called,
> > >
> > > ManagedObject *struct_Class_to_java_lang_Class(Class *clss) {...}
> > >
> > > Rather than cut/paste the body of struct_Class_to_java_lang_Class
into
> > > class_alloc_new_object(), how about simply calling
> > > struct_Class_to_java_lang_Class()? The only unknown is if we can
> assume
> > > the condition assert(!hythread_is_suspend_enabled() ); will be OK
> from
> > > the
> > > body of class_alloc_new_object(). Thoughts?
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Weldon Washburn
> > > Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Pavel Pervov,
> > Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Weldon Washburn
> Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division
>
--
Pavel Pervov,
Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division
--
Weldon Washburn
Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division
