On 4/5/07, Mikhail Loenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2007/4/4, Vladimir Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On 4/3/07, Stepan Mishura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 4/3/07, Vladimir Ivanov wrote: > > <SNIP> > > > > > > > I'd like to propose the next approach that may help us to know about > > > > instabilities: develop (or take existing one, for example, Eclipse > > > > hello world) a scenario for testing stability and configure CC to run > > > > it at all times. The stability scenario must be the only one scenario > > > > for CC; it must be short (no longer then an hour), test JRE in stress > > > > conditions and cover most of functionality. If the scenario fails then > > > > all newly committed updates are subject for investigation and fix (or > > > > rollback). > > > > > > Actually, I prefer something without GUI or at least without using > > > special 'GUI testing" tools. It should improve quality of this testing > > > (than less tools than more predictable results :)) Current "Eclipse > > > hello world" scenario based on the AutoIT for Win and X11GuiTest for > > > Linux platform. Also we have this scenario based on API calls which > > > should emulate GUI scenario. From these 2 approaches I prefer second > > > to minimize 'false alarms'. Or may be some other scenarios (non-GUI)? > > > > > > > > Did I understand you correctly that there may be 'false alarms' caused > > by using external 'GUI testing' tools? If yes which kind of 'false > > alarms' are there? > > Seems, in some cases the input from the X11GuiTest can be lost in the system :( > Also timeouts between different symbols may depends on the system load etc
How often does EHWA fail? Given that this scenario exercises VM very well and the scenario itself is pretty fast we may run it twice and report a problem if it fails both attempts.
It depends on platform: almost newer on Win (at least due to AutoIt), very rare on Linux x86 and often on Linux x86_64 (1 time for ~5 runs). While usually it is a hang I manually skip the notification sending. So, for this testing I also prefer non-GUI scenario. It can be unified for all platforms. thanks, Vladimir
Thanks, Mikhail > > Thanks, Vladimir > > > > > Thanks, > > Stepan. > > > > > Thanks, Vladimir > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thought? Objections? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Stepan. > > > > > > > > > I read the discussion on naming, and M1, M2, ... is fine by me. How > > > > > about we pick a proposed date for Apache Harmony M1? > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > Tim > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Stepan Mishura > > Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division > > >
