On 4/17/07, Stepan Mishura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/17/07, Nathan Beyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 4/16/07, Stepan Mishura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 4/17/07, Nathan Beyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 4/16/07, Spark Shen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > +1. > > > > > > > > But I have a question. Which tag should be use to check out concurrent code > > > > for 1.6? > > > > > > > > > > That's only partially true; there are some minor changes that have > > > been made on top of that code, as the code behind that tag has some > > > compile errors. > > > > > > > Current concurrent code used for 1.5 is using URL: > > > > http://gee.cs.oswego.edu/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/jsr166/?only_with_tag=JSR166_PFD > > > > That is tag only_with_tag=JSR166_PFD. > > > > > > > > http://gee.cs.oswego.edu/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/jsr166/ seems oak. Your > > > > opinion? > > > > > > We'd likely just take the trunk and see how it compares with JAPI > > > reports against Java 6 RI. Are the JAPI reports still being run? > > > > > > > My understanding is that in the classlib's branch we can use 1.5 for > > concurrent code and take concurrent trunk into classlib's branch > > latter. Correct? > > I presume you mean that after the Java 5 is tagged and the trunk > becomes the Java 6/latest branch again, then yes, we can pull in the > latest copy of the concurrent code there. > > Keep in mind, we do have to grab a copy of the code and check it into > SVN. Since it's public domain code, we keep it in the 'standard' > folder and pull it into classlib via an svn:externals link. >To be clear - I meant after taking concurrent trunk we'll have the following: classlib trunk modules/concurrent ---> standart/classlib/trunk/modules/concurrent (1.5) branches java6-branch modules/concurrent ---> standart/classlib/branches/java6-branch/modules/concurrent (1.6) Thanks, Stepan.
We could do that, but it would be just as easy to set the external link in trunk to a specific revision number and then check in the latest concurrent code to standard and point the java6 branch to the newer revision. -Nathan
> -Nathan > > > > > Thanks, > > Stepan. > > > > > > > > > > Best regards > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Spark Shen > > > > China Software Development Lab, IBM > > > > > > > > > >
