I'm trying it again, but I believe so, yes. Should one of the tests
fails? Didn't you mention that JET wouldn't work? Is JET used in the
"client" test?

-Nathan

On 4/19/07, Mikhail Fursov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And one more question: did these JVMTI tests passed with original patch?

On 4/20/07, Mikhail Fursov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Do you have the same JVMTI errors if you use -Xem:opt option?
> I'll try to reproduce your errors by forcing isSSE2Supported() return
> 'false' for every platform.
>
> On 4/20/07, Nathan Beyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I uploaded a test log that shows some errors from JVMTI tests (I think
> > that's what was blowing up). Those seem to be first if you just run
> > "./build.sh test".
> >
> > I'm running "./build.sh smoke.test " and it executing right now, but
> > it's very slow.
> >
> > -Nathan
> >
> > On 4/19/07, Mikhail Fursov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Check new patch, please.
> > >
> > > On 4/19/07, Nathan Beyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 4/18/07, Mikhail Fursov <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> > > > > It's a good idea.
> > > > > I'll do both: add k5 pass to all Jitrino.OPT configs and make EM
> > use
> > > > > opt.emconf by default.
> > > > > So there will no additional configuration nor command line
> > options!
> > > >
> > > > I'm not sure what all this means, but if the last line means DRLVM
> > > > will run and pass its tests on a P3 straight out of the build, then
> > > > that's a +1 from me.
> > > >
> > > > Are you going to post a new patch to this bug? Just so I know what
> > to
> > > > watch for.
> > > >
> > > > -Nathan
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 4/19/07, Gregory Shimansky < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Rana Dasgupta wrote:
> > > > > > > Could be a protocol between the EM and the jits, maybe?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I also think that EM is the right place to chose the correct
> > emconf
> > > > file
> > > > > > at runtime based on the CPU detection.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 4/18/07, Xiao-Feng Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > >> On 4/18/07, Pavel Ozhdikhin < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > >> > On 4/18/07, Alexey Varlamov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >> > > 2007/4/18, Mikhail Fursov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > > > > >> > > > Nathan,
> > > > > > >> > > > I checked the patch and it looks OK except a one issue.
> >
> > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > I do not really like that we have new p5.emconf in
> > codebase
> > > > and
> > > > > > >> propose
> > > > > > >> > > the
> > > > > > >> > > > following improvement:
> > > > > > >> > > > 1) add p5 pass to all Jitrino.OPT codegen aliases in
> > every
> > > > > > >> emconf we
> > > > > > >> > > have.
> > > > > > >> > > > (I can update the patch if agreed)
> > > > > > >> > > I suppose you meant all ia32 configs :). This is
> > neccesary step
> > > > to
> > > > > > >> > > CPUID autodetection, so it a must actually.
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > 2) a. After the commit: Make it turned off by default
> > and use
> > > > > > >> additional
> > > > > > >> > > > cmd-line -XX:jit.arg.codegen.p5=on when run on PC
> > without
> > > > SSE2
> > > > > > >> > > >    b. Start discussion: Use CPUID to detect if SSE2 is
> > > > available
> > > > > > >> and
> > > > > > >> > > make
> > > > > > >> > > > JIT turn this pass on automatically if needed.
> > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > We can implement CPUID check for SSE2 in JIT only (a
> > couple
> > > > of
> > > > > > >> lines of
> > > > > > >> > > > assembly for Linux and Windows)
> > > > > > >> > > > The question is: would it be better if VM provides such
> > > > service
> > > > > > for
> > > > > > >> > > every
> > > > > > >> > > > client? E.g. cpuid_is_sse2_supported()-like methods.
> > > > > > >> > > I'm in serious doubt that it is needed. Too IA-centric,
> > it
> > > > would
> > > > > > have
> > > > > > >> > > little sense in general case. So doing it right in Jit is
> > the
> > > > right
> > > > > > >> > > thing IMO.
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > Why do you think this is not needed? We might have several
> > JITs
> > > > or
> > > > > > >> > interpreter that can use and extended set of instructions.
> > It
> > > > would
> > > > > > >> be good
> > > > > > >> > to keep these checks in one place in VM.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> This is architecture specific property, hence Alexey may
> > think it
> > > > > > >> belongs to code generator (here JIT), since otherwise an
> > > > interpreter
> > > > > > >> in C may not need it. I think Alexey's point is valid. To
> > deal with
> > > > > > >> multiple JITs, probably we can put it into some JIT-common
> > files.
> > > > In
> > > > > > >> other words, although multiple JITs may query it, it is not
> > > > > > >> necessarily VM's duty to respond. (Or if we view the
> > JIT-common
> > > > > > >> support as part of VM, then yes, it can be provided by VM.)
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Thanks,
> > > > > > >> xiaofeng
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> > Thanks,
> > > > > > >> > Pavel
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > On 4/18/07, Nathan Beyer < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > Would anyone else like to review this patch? It's
> > somewhat
> > > > > > >> > > > > significant. I've tested it on a P4/WinXP and DRLVM
> > works
> > > > > > >> without any
> > > > > > >> > > > > noticeable regressions. I've done some initial tests
> > on a
> > > > Quad
> > > > > > >> > > > > P3/Ubuntu and I can now run a simple Hello World with
> > the
> > > > > > >> default JIT,
> > > > > > >> > > > > which is a huge step.
> > > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > If no one has any issues, I'm going to commit this
> > patch.
> > > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > -Nathan
> > > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > > > > > >> > > > > From: Nathan Beyer (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > > >> > > > > Date: Apr 18, 2007 12:49 AM
> > > > > > >> > > > > Subject: [jira] Commented: (HARMONY-3246)
> > [drlvm][jit][opt]
> > > > > > >> Jitted
> > > > > > >> > > > > code can not be executed on non-SSE2 platforms
> > > > > > >> > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > >     [
> > > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-3246?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12489614
> >
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> > > > > ]
> > > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > Nathan Beyer commented on HARMONY-3246:
> > > > > > >> > > > > ---------------------------------------
> > > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > I've test this on a Linux P3 and it seems to work.
> > I'm now
> > > > > > >> able to run
> > > > > > >> > > > > a simple hello world. Additionally, everything seems
> > to
> > > > work
> > > > > > >> as it did
> > > > > > >> > > > > on a P4/WinXP.
> > > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > Let's see if we can get a few more people to review
> > the
> > > > code.
> > > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > > [drlvm][jit][opt] Jitted code can not be executed
> > on
> > > > non-SSE2
> > > > > > >> > > platforms
> > > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >>
> > > >
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > >                 Key: HARMONY-3246
> > > > > > >> > > > > >                 URL:
> > > > > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-3246
> > > > > > >> > > > > >             Project: Harmony
> > > > > > >> > > > > >          Issue Type: Improvement
> > > > > > >> > > > > >          Components: DRLVM
> > > > > > >> > > > > >            Reporter: Nikolay Sidelnikov
> > > > > > >> > > > > >         Assigned To: Nathan Beyer
> > > > > > >> > > > > >         Attachments: p5_fixed_commented.patch
> > > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > > Jitrino generates code with SSE and SSE2
> > instructions
> > > > which
> > > > > > >> can not
> > > > > > >> > > be
> > > > > > >> > > > > executed on processors older than Pentium 4.
> > > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > --
> > > > > > >> > > > > This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> > > > > > >> > > > > -
> > > > > > >> > > > > You can reply to this email to add a comment to the
> > issue
> > > > > > online.
> > > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > --
> > > > > > >> > > > Mikhail Fursov
> > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> --
> > > > > > >> http://xiao-feng.blogspot.com
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Gregory
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Mikhail Fursov
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Mikhail Fursov
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Mikhail Fursov




--
Mikhail Fursov

Reply via email to