2007/4/25, Alexey Petrenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Yep, it is possible of course. I've added this task to my nearest-future-to-do-list but have not complete it yet. :)
Alexey I was talking about regular statistics that we refer at http://harmony.apache.org/subcomponents/classlibrary/status.html My suggestion was to add one more stats: without "endorsed" packages The statistics itself is located at http://www.kaffe.org/~stuart/... Not sure that there is write access there from your nearest-future-to-do-list ;) Thanks, Mikhail
I'll finish it this week. SY, Alexey 2007/4/25, Mikhail Loenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi Stuart, > > As it was discussed in the thread I'm copying, we are free > to replace classes in the packages listed here [1] by "classes implementing > a more recent version of the API as defined by the appropriate > standards body" [2] > > Would it be possible to generate JAPI diffs not taking into account packages > listed in [1] so that we get clear picture about amount of API work remained? > > Thanks, > Mikhail > > [1] http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/standards/index.html > [2] http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/README.html > > > > 2007/1/23, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Alexey Petrenko wrote: > > > 2007/1/17, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > >> so what do we do? I'm hoping that we can find a way to achieve this > > >> w/o us having to have "shadow" or duplicate code here... > > > That would be great. Can you suggest something? > > > > As Alexey wrote, the level of CORBA support in the RI 5.0 [1] is > > predominantly 2.3.1 based. However, we are free to implement a later > > version of the Corba spec and still be compliant since the CORBA code is > > an "endorsed standard" (see [2]). > > > > In this case I suggest we support Yoko in their goal of implementing > > corba 2.4 (and ignore the JAPI diffs). > > > > [1] http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/idl/compliance.html > > [2] http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/README.html > > > > Regards, > > Tim > > > > >
