Current CC/CI status (now, April 26, 17:00 NSK):
Linux'es are OK.
we have intermittently failed test on Windows XP:
------------------ execution log ------------------------------
error: testGetAllStackTraces java.lang.ThreadTest
Unit Test Error Details: (1)
Test: testGetAllStackTracesClass: java.lang.ThreadTest
java.util.NoSuchElementException
at java.util.WeakHashMap$HashIterator.next(WeakHashMap.java:162)
at java.util.AbstractCollection.toArray(AbstractCollection.java)
at java.lang.ThreadGroup.copyThreads(ThreadGroup.java)
at java.lang.ThreadGroup.enumerate(ThreadGroup.java:456)
at java.lang.ThreadGroup.enumerate(ThreadGroup.java:472)
at java.lang.ThreadGroup.enumerate(ThreadGroup.java:472)
at java.lang.ThreadGroup.enumerate(ThreadGroup.java:202)
at java.lang.Thread.getAllStackTraces(Thread.java)
at java.lang.ThreadTest.testGetAllStackTraces(ThreadTest.java:1011)
at java.lang.reflect.VMReflection.invokeMethod(VMReflection.java)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:382)
at junit.framework.TestCase.runTest(TestCase.java:164)
at junit.framework.TestCase.runBare(TestCase.java)
at junit.framework.TestResult$1.protect(TestResult.java)
at junit.framework.TestResult.runProtected(TestResult.java)
at junit.framework.TestResult.run(TestResult.java)
at junit.framework.TestCase.run(TestCase.java)
at junit.framework.TestSuite.runTest(TestSuite.java)
at junit.framework.TestSuite.run(TestSuite.java)
at
org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTestRunner.run(JUnitTestRunner.java)
at
org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTestRunner.launch(JUnitTestRunner.java:672)
at
org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTestRunner.main(JUnitTestRunner.java:546)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Windows x86_64:
we have intermittently failed tests:
gc.LOS_jet
gc.MultiThreads_jet
gc.Mark_opt
thanks, Vladimir
On 4/26/07, Mikhail Loenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2007/4/26, Alexey Petrenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Looks like all the CCs are up now. Is that correct?
the 'now' is last time you pressed 'refresh' :)
what does 'now' mean in your case?
Thanks,
Mikhail
>
> SY, Alexey
>
> 2007/4/26, Mikhail Loenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > We should freeze when all CCs are in the up state [1]
> >
> > Can we use the snapshots [2]? My understanding is that the snapshots
> > are updated in the "all CCs up" moments, so probably almost-a-week old
> > snapshots are the best for the Milestone.
> >
> > Were there any significant changes since that? I know about gc switch,
> > but not sure how it affected stability...
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Mikhail
> >
> > [1] http://www.harmonytest.org/upload/cc1.html
> > [2] http://people.apache.org/builds/harmony/snapshots/
> >
> > 2007/4/26, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > To ensure we get a stable build we need to freeze the code for a short
> > > duration, which will allow us to:
> > >
> > > - produce the set of milestone candidates,
> > > i.e. a full rebuild on Windows, Linux (with libstdc++ v5 dependency)
> > > and Linux (with libstdc++ v6 dependency) in JRE, JDK, and HDK
> > > formats. At this point we will still only publish x86 snapshots.
> > >
> > > - test the snapshots,
> > > i.e. test installs (it would be good if you have a machine without
> > > your usual development environment set up to ensure we don't have
> > > dependencies on dev tools); and testing various applications to check
> > > they work as well as we would expect for this snapshot.
> > >
> > > While we do this it is helpful if the codebase is not being changed. It
> > > sounds like people are happy enough to freeze HEAD rather than create a
> > > branch, so let's do that.
> > >
> > > During the freeze there should be no commits unless we agree here on the
> > > dev list that there is a problem serious enough for us to re-spin a new
> > > candidate. I would hope that producing the snapshots and some focused
> > > testing can happen over one or two days (max) to declare the build good.
> > > Once the milestone is declared good we will reopen for development as
> > > usual.
> > >
> > > Does that sound like a reasonable procedure? Did I miss anything out?
> > >
> > > so:
> > > - when do we freeze (today/tomorrow)? any outstanding MUST fix's?
> > > - volunteers with machines for producing the candidates?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Tim
> > >
> >
>
