And we can do this ourselves...
2007/4/26, Mikhail Loenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
What we need I think is completeness metrics. Since those differences
that are caused by newer specs are OK, they don't affect completeness.
So the real API completeness might be higher than what we see now.
Having the real picture would help us to first stick those really unimplemented
classes remained and second better position our state
So it's good to have both: compatibility that Stuart is currently measuring
and completeness to what we want to achive.
Thanks,
Mikhail
2007/4/26, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Mikhail Loenko wrote:
> > well, let's resume discussion whether Harmony must contain implementation
> > of the endorsed specs of the same version as RI or may contain a newer
> > version
> >
> > Tim, could you please comment on that?
>
> Only to say that the SE spec allows for us to implement a later version
> of these endorsed external specifications; however, Stuart is measuring
> compatibility to Sun's implementation, not compliance. We should expect
> to see a difference to the extent that the Corba code is incompatible
> with previous versions.
>
> Regards,
> Tim
>
>
