Actually, not yet. Eclipse 3.1.1 failed to start in my env on WinXP :( Probably, Ivan found the root cause for this failure (thread: [drlvm][eclipse] eclipse failed to start today in my env on WinXp x86).
thanks, Vladimir On 4/27/07, Mikhail Loenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Vladimir wrote about problem with launching Eclipse. Was it resolved? 2007/4/27, Alexey Petrenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Great. So CCs for x86 are up and all the critical issues are resolved. > It looks like time for freeze and prepare a build. > > Did I forget something? Any other critical issues? > > SY, Alexey > > 2007/4/27, Gregory Shimansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Alexey Petrenko wrote: > > > DRLVM has been switched back to GCv4. > > > HARMONY-3764 "[drlvm][build] jar with kernel classes' sources is not > > > generated" has been resolved > > > Patch for HARMONY-3730 "[drlvm][jvmti] SINGLE_STEP events are not > > > reported in JIT mode" has been applied but the issue is not closed. > > > Gregory, do you have anything to do with this issue or you just forgot > > > to press resolve button? :) > > > > Sorry, just forgot to mark it resolved indeed. Done now. > > > > > 2007/4/26, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > >> Xiao-Feng Li wrote: > > >> > On 4/26/07, Sergey Kuksenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> >> Hi All, > > >> >> > > >> >> I wish to notify that GCv5 currently has a stability problem. > > >> >> > > >> >> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-3746 > > >> >> I think We should fix the bug before freese or switch back to GCv4.1. > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > I noticed that, and am trying to reproduce it, so far can't reproduce > > >> > it locally. I am now trying to connect the test machine to check the > > >> > problem. Hopefully it can be fixed quite soon within two days. > > >> > Otherwise, I'd vote to switch it back to GCv4.1. > > >> > > > >> > The other solution would be to choose a revision and make a release > > >> > branch from it. Then we don't need to freeze the code base for new > > >> > developments. This is actually common for industry product release. > > >> > > >> Ok, let's wait and see what you conclude. > > >> > > >> Regards, > > >> Tim > > >> > > > > > > > > > -- > > Gregory > > > > >
