Agreed. Should sort() be expected to behave like the RI for invalid comparators? IMHO the answer is no. I think in this case a bug should be raised with Eclipse to get the test fixed.

Regards,
Oliver

Aleksey Ignatenko wrote:
The only fix for all related issues is to have the same implementation of
such functionality as RI, as you understand it is unreachable goal unless
you use RI classlib. So therefore I would say the right solution is to fix
tests.

Aleksey.


On 5/16/07, Sergey Kuksenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

As we discussed the source of the errror is incorrect comparator.
However, I can suggest a patch to Arrays which makes Arrays.sort()
slightly
close to RI.
With the patch sorting algorithm is not changed, but ArraysSortTest.javais
passed as on RI.
The patch is attached to the issue.

On 5/16/07, Aleksey Ignatenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> From H-3339 comment:
>
> As the bug is in the tests then it is to be filed on Eclipse and this
JIRA
> closed with comment about Eclipse bug.
> Please, see https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=176157 as
> example
> of Harmony related bug.
>
> BR,
> Aleksey Ignatenko.
>
> On 5/15/07, Sergey Kuksenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > As you wrote in the JIRA the reason of failure is incorrect Comparator
> > which
> > is used in the test.
> > The Comparator violates the follwing rule from specification:
> > "The implementor must ensure that sgn(compare(x, y)) ==
> > -sgn(compare(y, x))for all
> > x and y."
> > So I thing that It would be more correct to fix a comparator from
test.
> >
> > Some words about bug2bug compatibility. The fact that RI has different > > result on this comparator means nothing, because in case of different > > incorect comparator RI may give a different unpredictable results. So
> > should
> > we check *all possible set of incorrect comparators* and move exactly
in
> > same results as done by RI?
> > I think that it will mean that we should have completely the same
> > implementation of sorting.
> >
> >
> >
> > On 5/15/07, Eugene Ostrovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all.
> > >
> > > Some of eclipse tests pass on RI but fail on harmony. See
> > > *HARMONY-3339<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-3339>
> > > * .
> > > The tests are incorrect. They pass on RI due to difference in
> > > implementation
> > > of Arrays.sort() method.
> > >
> > > Shall we alter our Array.sort() implementation to be consistent with
> RI
> > > ant
> > > to make these buggy tests pass?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Eugene.
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> > ---
> > Sergey Kuksenko.
> > Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division.
> >
>



--
Best regards,
---
Sergey Kuksenko.
Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division.



--
Oliver Deakin
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU

Reply via email to