This is indeed a very interesting issue. WeakReference probably should
not be used for critical resource management.

Thanks,
xiaofeng

On 5/24/07, Yu-Nan He (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[drlvm][thread] memory leak in thread pool implementation
---------------------------------------------------------

                 Key: HARMONY-3956
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-3956
             Project: Harmony
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: DRLVM
         Environment: Linux
            Reporter: Yu-Nan He


I found a very interesting design issue in threading part about the thread pool 
implementation. This introduces memory leaks and sometimes fails classlib 
tests. This can be a potential issue for server side applications.

The current thread pool is implemented through WeakReference( ThreadWeakRef  ), 
i.e., each created Java thread will be managed with a WeakReference, and the 
reference object will be put into the referenceQueue when the thread exits. But 
the enqueuing of the finished thread depends on WeakReference processing of the 
JVM, hence depending on the GC collection cycle. If GC has large enough free 
space, not to collect the heap and process WeakReference, the finished threads 
will not be returned to the referenceQueue.  It is possible that, lots of 
finished threads are not enqueued before a GC happen, gradually running out 
native memory for new thread creation.

To work around this issue, TM can trigger GC from time to time when the 
referenceQueue is empty. But I guess a right solution is to use some other 
mechanism for thread pool implementation. Since thread entity is scare resource 
for the system, we probably donot want to depend its management on the 
WeakReference processing, since there is no specified behavior on the timing of 
WeakReference processing. This is the key issue. That means, even the TM 
triggers GC from time to time, we cannot guarantee the finished threads will be 
enqueued on time before system crashes.

In my experiments in Linux32, I found classlib tests (run "ant test" in 
working_classlib) failed from time to time due to this issue. The error message is new 
thread cannot be created.

It would be great if the threading guys can think of some good solution for 
this issue.


--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.




--
http://xiao-feng.blogspot.com

Reply via email to