Mikhail Loenko wrote: > 2007/6/11, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Mikhail Loenko wrote: >> > 2007/6/9, Morozova, Nadezhda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> Mikhail, >> >> The new history snapshot page looks great. Only one question: why does >> >> one of the snapshots look green? If it has some specific meaning >> ,we can >> >> explain that on the page. If it does not, we could just use white >> >> background to set off the blue one - though other tables on the >> site all >> >> use the same blue and don't seem to mind. >> > >> > The intent is to have slightly different background colors >> > for odd and even lines in the table >> >> I guess it is a matter of taste, but while the table is ok for snapshot >> builds where people can search for a given build in a long list, I think >> it is too cluttered for presenting our latest stable builds. > > many terms are overloaded :) > > I guess you meant not those "stable builds" that are milestones but > those snapshots that are a bit more stable than snapshot of an arbitrary > state > > That's right, the table is a bit complicated. We may point what we > have as a "latest" snapshot to something more stable than others, so > that people who need just "a snapshot" won't have to study the > table.
Yes, and yes! Regards, Tim
