I agree that it is ok just to throw exception if JAR/ZIP file is closed. IMO RI's behavior is too complex to follow.
Regards, 2007/6/13, Tony Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Ok, If no one objects, I'd like to provider a new patch for 2436 and create another JIRA to record this non-bug difference, since the old one is outdated. On 6/11/07, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tony Wu wrote: > > Hi, > > Seems RI cached some bytes, which can be read even if the jarfile has > > been closed. I wonder what's your opinion about that? should we follow > > RI to cache the bytes and should we use the buffer size the same as > > RI? > > Sounds like a bug in the RI to me. If the JAR is closed I would not > expect to be able to read from it. I suggest closing as a non-bug > difference. > > Regards, > Tim > -- Tony Wu China Software Development Lab, IBM
-- Alexei Zakharov, Intel ESSD
