On 6/25/07, Mikhail Loenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Let's create snapshots and then decide (based on testing results?) what to release
Why not to have them all? I don't understand. Sorry if I missed anything, but I think it's always good to have the choices available, otherwise the users who want to try will build them anyway. Thanks, xiaofeng
Thanks, Mikhail 2007/6/25, Stepan Mishura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On 6/24/07, Mikhail Loenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We have passed our code freeze date for M2 > > > > Mikhail, > > Just to be clear - M1 milestone published snapshots include build for > Windows x86, Linux (libstdc++ v5 and libstdc++ v6) x86 and Windows > x86_64. > > I assume that we still aimed to x86 architecture and I need to build > milestone candidates for: > - Windows x86 > - Linux x86. BWT, again for both libstdc++ versions? > > And what about x86_64? > > As I said M1 includes Windows x86_64. Should we publish them to let > the community test them to see how good they are? > > Thanks, > Stepan. > > > Last time we executed Tim's policy that each commit should have > > approval from two committers, let's follow the same way -- no more > > commits please, without agreement from two committers on the dev list. > > > > Now let's test what we have and see if any critical bugs were > > introduced just before the code freeze. Please raise anything you > > think is critical/blocker for consideration. > > > > Thanks, > > Mikhail > > > > > -- > Stepan Mishura > Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division >
-- http://xiao-feng.blogspot.com
