Hi all, I think README is mostly ready - you'll only have to remove references to lin/x86_64 platform that we don't support in the milestone, and add a reference to Release Notes.
Release Notes are not ready yet, and people are sending in feedback. If somebody could assemble a ready version before M2 is packed, that'd be great. Otherwise, we could store the relnotes on the site and pack the snapshot without them. the site version could appear early next week. I'm packed full right now and won't be able to look into the docs before Sunday or Monday, so volunteers are encouraged to help resolve H-4277 that carries the Relnotes and README drafts. Cheers, Nadya >-----Original Message----- >From: Mikhail Loenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 3:10 PM >To: [email protected] >Subject: Re: [general] ready for release? > >I think they are not yet ready. And we agreed to have fixed schedule. >Can we update them in M3? :) > >Thanks, >Mikhail > >2007/6/29, Alexey Petrenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Just not forget to update readme.txt and ReleaseNotes.html. >> Everything else is looks ok for me. >> >> SY, Alexey >> >> 2007/6/29, Mikhail Loenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> > So far the following suites and scenarios either passed or had no >> > unexpected failures or regressions: >> > >> > Windows 32: >> > Classlib (HUT), EUT, Functional, GUT, JDKTools, Reliability, Stress, >> > TPTP, and VTSVM suites >> > Ant, Axis, Dacapo, EHWA, Jetty, SciMark, Struts, and Tomcat scenarios >> > >> > EGAx48 has been running without problems so far >> > >> > Linux 32: >> > Classlib (HUT), Functional, GUT, JDKTools, >> > Ant, Axis, Dacapo, EHWA, Jetty, Scimark, Struts >> > >> > No other results are vailable so far. >> > >> > I suggest that [if we pass EGAx48?] we announce r551077 as M2 on two >> > platforms: win32 and linux32. >> > >> > Comments? Known blockers? TODOs? >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Mikhail >> > >>
